Indian Intervention to the Neighbouring Countries.

The main trend of Indian politics has been to establish its market in South Asian countries by expanding its influence and dominance in neighboring countries. We have been hearing about Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan that they have been playing a diplomatic and practical role in forming governments in their favor, challenging their independence and sovereignty.

We understand that India is supporting separatist forces in Pakistan’s Balochistan province. It is investing in to create internal discord and weaken it and embroil it in internal conflict. It is also providing financial and other covert support to mobilize proxy groups against Pakistan through Afghanistan. India has shown its war fever face  by taking military action against Pakistan last month to assert regional dominance, although its aspirations have not been fulfilled.

We will be able to understand and talk about Nepal in more depth. Historically, Nepal has been going through a semi-colonial state under the rule of India during the British era due to the Nepal-India War during the British era and the Sugauli Treaty that resulted from it. Even after India became independent from the British, the policy of keeping Nepal under the Indian security umbrella has been continued through the treaties of 1950 and 1965.  We have to bear the fact that the Nehru Doctrine, which claims Indian dominance from Afghanistan to the Himalayas, has been the central expression of the expansionist policy and behavior of Indian politics to this day. There are many mutual relations between Nepal and India. Taking advantage of the ground reality where philosophy, religion, culture and traditional relations between people influence each other, it has been the Indian ideology to influence Nepali society, the masses and the political leadership through Vedic-Sanatan-Varnashram-Dharma.

In popular and simple language, it has been the ideology of the Indian ruling class to dull the aspirations of the Nepali people for change on the basis of Hindutva. That is, there is a continuous effort to keep Nepal’s political and social life under influence and pressure on the basis of Hindutva ideology.

India has played a role in every political change in Nepal according to its colonial character. Not only has India’s dominance over economically and strategically important territories like Kalapani-Lipulekh in Nepal been encroached upon at dozens of places along the border, but also important water resources have been turned over to its own interests. Political sieges and blockades have become a part of Indian politics to force the Nepali ruling power to formulate policies in line with Indian monopoly in areas like markets, trade, and transit. Indian industries have been closing doors to Nepali workers for employment. The right to form organizations and strike for professional rights is being prohibited. The open border is being used in its own interests to maintain a monopoly over the marketing of Nepali agricultural products.

India has been an obstacle to Nepal’s independent economic development and industrialization process. Plans are being implemented to maintain a favorable political situation through indirect investment in the formation of political leadership through commercial embassies. In particular, the labor movement is pursuing a policy of establishing a leadership according to their interests and keeping the revolutionary trade union movement under siege and pressure. The continuation of India’s policy of maintaining its influence and pressure mainly through the fine management of the state machinery. The Nepali trade union movement and communist movement are striving to free themselves from the interference in Nepal for reasons such as control over Nepalese sovereignty through treaties and agreements on Nepal’s independence, sovereignty and prosperity, and control over industrial development through trade and transit treaties.

The door to socialism can be opened only by achieving a struggle and victory against feudalism-imperialism, mainly Indian expansionism, and fulfilling the task of the new democratic revolution. For that, it is necessary to open a regional and international front today.